Agenda of Policy Committee Meeting - Tuesday, 6 July 2021

6 July 2021

Policy Committee

Membership

Chairperson	Mayor Garry Webber
Deputy Chairperson	Cr Monique Gray
Members	Cr Grant Dally Cr Mark Dean Cr James Denyer Cr Murray Grainger Cr Anne Henry Cr Kevin Marsh Cr Margaret Murray-Benge Deputy Mayor John Scrimgeour Cr Allan Sole Cr Don Thwaites
Quorum	6
Frequency	Six weekly

Role:

· To develop and review strategies, policies, plans and bylaws to advance the strategic direction of Council and its communities.

· To ensure an integrated approach to land development (including land for housing), land use and transportation to enable, support and shape sustainable, vibrant and safe communities.

· To ensure there is sufficient and appropriate housing supply and choice in existing and new urban areas to meet current and future needs.

Scope:

· Development and review of bylaws in accordance with legislation including determination of the nature and extent of community engagement approaches to be employed.

· Development, review and approval of strategies and plans in accordance with legislation including determination of the nature and extent of community engagement approaches to be employed.

· Subject to compliance with legislation and the Long Term Plan, to resolve all matters of strategic policy outside of the Long Term Plan process which does not require, under the Local Government Act 2002, a resolution of Council.

· Development of District Plan changes up to the point of public notification under the Resource Management Act 1991.

· Development of the Future Development Strategy and urban settlement plan.

· Consider and approve changes to service delivery arrangements arising from service delivery reviews required under the Local Government Act 2002 (provided that where a service delivery proposal requires an amendment to the Long Term Plan, it shall thereafter be progressed by the Annual Plan and Long Term Plan Committee).

· To report to Council on financial implications of policies and recommend any changes or variations to allocated budgets.

· Listen to and receive the presentation of views by people and engage in spoken interaction with people pursuant to section 83(1)(d) of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to any processes Council undertakes to consult on under the special consultative procedure as required by the Local Government Act 2002 or any other Act.

· Oversee the development of strategies relating to sub-regional parks and sub-regional community facilities for the enhancement of the social and cultural wellbeing of the Western Bay of Plenty District communities, for recommendation to Tauranga City Council and Western Bay of Plenty District Council.

· Develop the draft Statement of Intent for any Council Council-Controlled organisation (CCO) and review, assess and make recommendations to Council on any modifications to CCO or other entities’ accountability documents (i.e. Letter of Expectation, Statement of Intent) or governance arrangements.

· Approve Council submissions to central government, councils and other organisations, including submissions on proposed plan changes or policy statements.

· Receive and make decisions and recommendations to Council and its Committees, as appropriate, on reports, recommendations and minutes of the following:

- SmartGrowth Leadership Group

- Regional Land Transport Committee

- Any other Joint Committee, Forum or Working Group, as directed by Council.

· Receive and make decisions on, as appropriate, any matters of a policy or planning nature from the following:

- Waihi Beach, Katikati, Ōmokoroa, Te Puke and Maketu Community Boards,

- Maketu-Te Puke Ward Forum

- Kaimai Community Ward Forum

- Katikati- Waihi Beach Ward Forum

Power to Act:

· To make all decisions necessary to fulfil the role and scope of the Committee subject to the limitations imposed.

Power to Recommend:

· To Council and/or any Committee as it deems appropriate.

Power to sub-delegate:

· The Committee may delegate any of its functions, duties or powers to a subcommittee, working group or other subordinate decision-making body subject to the restrictions within its delegations and provided that any such sub-delegation includes a statement of purpose and specification of task.

Notice is hereby given that a Policy Committee Meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Barkes Corner, Tauranga on:
Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 9.00am

Order Of Business

1 Present 5

2 In Attendance. 5

3 Apologies. 5

4 Consideration of Late Items. 5

5 Declarations of Interest 5

6 Public Excluded Items. 5

7 Public Forum.. 5

8 Presentations. 5

9 Reports. 6

9.1 Ōmokoroa Plan Change update. 6

9.2 Draft CCTV Management Plan. 16

9.3 Submissions on Behalf of Council 33

10 Information for Receipt 49

Policy Committee Meeting Agenda

6 July 2021

9 Reports

9.1 Ōmokoroa Plan Change update

File Number: A4094406

Author: Tracey Miller, Senior Policy Analyst Resource Management

Authoriser: Rachael Davie, Group Manager Policy Planning And Regulatory Services

Executive Summary

1. Council proposes to apply to the Minister for the Environment to use the Streamlined Planning Process for the Ōmokoroa Plan Change. The Plan Change includes an updated Structure Plan for an area commonly known as Stage 3 as well as residential rules to support the necessary growth and development on the Peninsula. The residential rules apply to the entire Ōmokoroa area and seek to ensure that positive amenity outcomes can be achieved alongside the necessary increase in housing density.

2. The peninsula will eventually have a population of approximately 12,000 people. It is important that high quality, connected, liveable neighbourhoods are enabled. Alongside the proposed residential rules, a Residential Design Outcomes document has been prepared to guide developers as well as consenting staff on achieving a high-quality design environment.

3. The Streamlined Planning Process (SPP) offers more efficiency and flexibility by enabling a tailored planning process. It is proposed that the SPP removes further submissions and appeal rights. It is anticipated that the Plan Change would therefore be operative sooner when compared to the usual Schedule 1 Plan Change process through the Resource Management Act.

4. A key component to the Structure Plan has been the location of a large active reserve. As a result of community consultation, Option 1, which adjoins Ōmokoroa Road and runs between the Francis Road re-alignment and Prole Road, has been selected because of its greater placemaking opportunities over Option 2.

Recommendation

1. That the Senior Policy Analyst’s report dated 6 July 2021, titled ‘Ōmokoroa Plan Change Update’, be received.

2. That the report relates to an issue that is considered to be of low significance in terms of Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. That Council applies to the Minister for the Environment to use the Streamlined Planning Process in accordance with Section 80C of the Resource Management Act to process and adopt the structure plan and associated rules.

4. That for the purpose of notifying the Structure Plan the Active Reserves, Option 1, adjoining Ōmokoroa Road is included on the Structure Plan as the preferred option for Active Reserve.

Background

5. The National Policy Statement on Urban Development (NPS-UD) requires Council to ensure adequate supply of land for residential and commercial purposes and requires appropriate provisions are in place to support good quality high density housing.

6. The Ōmokoroa Plan Change has been in progress for a number of years. Ōmokoroa has long been identified as a growth area within the Western Bay of Plenty sub region.

7. The final round of informal consultation (prior to notification) was completed on 24 June. This comprised of two public engagement sessions as well as one session specifically for landowners within Stage 3 of Ōmokoroa. The online Have Your Say portal was also open for two weeks from 10 to 24 June. The online portal provided all the information that was available at the engagement sessions. The purpose of the consultation was to seek feedback on the draft structure plan, draft residential rules as well as two separate options for active reserves. The events were well attended with 157 people attending the open days. A summary of the feedback will be provided separately.

8. Council proposes to use the Streamline Planning Process on the basis that it will implement a national direction. An application to use the SPP requires detailed information upfront in the application stage. The level of information required is proportionate to the complexity of the planning issue being considered. The Minister may require further information to enable a direction to be issued. Once a direction has been issued, Council will need to adhere to the direction and timeframes outlined in the gazette notice.

9. The SPP provides the ability to tailor the plan change process in such a way that reflects the complexity of a particular planning issue. For example, a slightly shortened consultation process is considered appropriate given the amount of consultation that has already occurred on the Ōmokoroa Structure Plan. The following steps are proposed:

10.

#	Process Step	Description	Timeframe	Dates
1.	Consultation with affected parties on the proposed planning instrument	3 rounds of public engagement will have been completed prior to lodging the application with the Minister. This has also included specific targeted engagement with key stakeholders, landowners and tangata whenua.	Period of informal stakeholder consultation will end on 24 June 2021.
2	Council Approval	Approval to lodge SPP with Minister		6 July
3	Ministerial Approval	Minister approves SPP application (Assumption only)	22 working days (Assumption only)	6 August
4.	Public notification of Ōmokoroa Structure Plan in accordance with clause 5 (other than clause 5(3)), or limited notification under clause 5A	Publicly notify proposed Ōmokoroa Structure Plan for written submissions in accordance with clause 5 of Schedule 1 of the RMA. A period of 20 working days for submissions to be specified in the public notice.	Public notification proposed once WBOPDC receives approval to use SPP and process is gazetted. Within 10 working days of Ministers Direction being gazetted.	Open 21 August
5.	An opportunity for written submissions under clause 6 or 6A.	An opportunity for written submissions under clause 6 or 6A of the RMA.	Public submissions to be received no later than 20 working days after public notification.	Close 17 September
6.	The preparation of reports and documents required by clause 83(1) (a) to (g).
7.	Draft s42A report	Planning report to the Hearings Panel	30 working days	22 October
8.	Pre-hearing dispute resolution (if required)	Pre-hearing dispute resolution with any willing submitters to seek resolution of any matters prior to the hearing if feasible in accordance with clause 8AA of Schedule 1 of the RMA	10 working days	5 November
9.	Finalise s42A		10 working days	19 November
10.	Public hearing	Conduct a public hearing under clause 8B of Schedule 1 of the RMA. The hearing panel may permit cross examination.	Within 10 working days of s42A report being sent to submitters	3 December
11.	Hearing Panel drafts report on recommended changes to Structure Plan / Plan Change (if any).	Hearing Panel to prepare a draft report showing how submissions have been considered and the changes (if any) recommended to the proposed Structure Plan / Plan Change. This report must include how the Hearing Panel gave particular regard to the section 32 evaluation report and any additional report prepared under section 32AA (as may be relevant).	This Step to be completed no later than 20 working days after commencement of the public hearing (Step 10).	28 January
12.	Technical Review	Hearing panel draft decision be sent to submitters for comment on technical drafting matters only	10 days	11 February
13.	Hearing Panel final decision	Decision finalised in response to technical comments received.	10 days	25 February
14.	Report to the Minister for decision.	Provide for the Minister for the Environment’s consideration of the written reports and documents required by clause 83(1) of Schedule 1 of the RMA.	20 working days	25 March
Total timeframe		All steps to be completed within 159 working days (from Minister approval – step 3 until report provided to Minister – step 14). This period includes 12 public holidays.

11. The SPP that is proposed varies from the RMA Schedule 1 process by not having a “further submission” round, and not providing for appeals to the Environment Court. To ensure fairness and to seek a quality outcome, two additional steps are inserted being a mediation step prior to the s42 Planning Report being finalised, and an opportunity for submitters to comment on the Hearing Panel’s draft decision on technical matters relating to rules.

12. A draft SPP application was provided to the Ministry for the Environment (MfE) in May for their feedback, which has been incorporated into a final application. The application to use the SPP needs to be approved by the Minister and there is no set timeframe for this. The Minister may ask for further information and may also decline the application. In working with MfE, staff are confident that a robust and thorough application to the Minister has been prepared and there are strong grounds for the Minster to support and approve the application.

Active Reserves

13. To support the growing Ōmokoroa community, it is important that sufficient land is secured in strategic locations for recreational facilities to meet the community’s needs. In addition to sportsfields, there is an identified need for aquatic and indoor multi-use sports facilities / events space to serve a fully developed Ōmokoroa and the wider catchment area. Due to higher density housing proposed within Stage 3, it is important that sufficient levels of open space are provided for. An area (approximately 10ha in size) of active reserve is proposed.

14. Various locations for the active reserve have been considered within Stage 3. The options were narrowed down to two sites. One being on the corner of Ōmokoroa Road and Prole Road and the other located off Francis Road. Refer to Attachment 2. These were put to the community at the final round of informal consultation between 10-24 June for their feedback.

15. Option 1 (corner of Ōmokoroa Road and Prole Road) has emerged as the preferred option for the following reasons:

· Place making opportunities as well as adjoining the primary and secondary school site

· Council owns 2.6ha

· Good access from adjoining roads without going through residential streets

· Provides a prominent entranceway into the peninsula with views north out to the Kaimai ranges

· Able to ‘share’ carparking with park and ride facility

· Relatively flat land

· Good rectangular shape

Significance and Engagement

16. The Local Government Act 2002 requires a formal assessment of the significance of matters and decision in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. In making this formal assessment there is no intention to assess the importance of this item to individuals, groups, or agencies within the community and it is acknowledged that all reports have a high degree of importance to those affected by Council decisions.

The Policy requires Council and its communities to identify the degree of significance attached to particular issues, proposals, assets, decisions, and activities.

17. In terms of the Significance and Engagement Policy this decision is considered to be of low significance because the growth of Ōmokoroa and associated RMA Plan Change process has been widely known for some time by landowners and the community. The Plan Change process to adopt the Stage 3 Structure Plan and associated rules requires pre-consultation (which has occurred) and formal consultation through the Resource Management Act.

Engagement, Consultation and Communication

Interested/Affected Parties	Completed/Planned Engagement/Consultation/Communication
Name of interested parties/groups	Extensive consultation has occurred over the last three years with developers, BOPRC, TCC, NZTA, and MoE. This has included three rounds of public engagement as well as targeted workshops.	Planned	Completed
Tangata Whenua	Ongoing consultation with Pirirakau and Ngati Taka throughout the process. A cultural Overlay was commissioned from Pirirakau.
General Public	Three rounds of public engagement have been held over the last three years with landowners and the wider community. Note that there is further opportunity for input for all parties through the formal notification, submission, and hearing process under the RMA.

Issues and Options Assessment

18. There are two sets of options that are interrelated. The first relates to the use of the Streamlined Planning Process (Option A), and the second to the selection of the location of the active reserve (Option B).

Option A1 (Use the Streamlined Planning Process to progress the Plan Change)
Assessment of advantages and disadvantages including impact on each of the four well-beings · Economic · Social · Cultural · Environmental	Advantages: - Faster process - Certainty of timing Disadvantages: - Lack of appeal rights might be a negative to some.
Costs (including present and future costs, direct, indirect and contingent costs).	All within the budget. Cost is less that Option A2 because of deleting the further submission process and appeals to the Environment Court.
Other implications and any assumptions that relate to this option (Optional – if you want to include any information not covered above).
Option A2 (Use RMA Schedule 1)
Assessment of advantages and disadvantages including impact on each of the four well-beings · Economic · Social · Cultural · Environmental	Advantages: - Allows for appeals to the Environment Court Disadvantages: - Slower process, particularly if appeals are lodged. - Less certainty about timing.
Costs (including present and future costs, direct, indirect and contingent costs).	Costs will be greater that Option A1, particularly with regard to appeals to the Environment Court.
Other implications and any assumptions that relate to this option (Optional – if you want to include any information not covered above).
Option B1 (Structure Plan based on Active reserve Option 1)
Assessment of advantages and disadvantages including impact on each of the four well-beings · Economic · Social · Cultural · Environmental	Advantages: - Council owns approximately 2.6ha of this land. - This site provides a prominent entranceway into Ōmokoroa with views to the north including the Kaimai ranges. - Good access from existing and proposed road network (Prole and Francis re-alignment). - High profile site adjoining school site and in close proximity to town centre. - Good visibility from Ōmokoroa Road for way finding. - Adjoins proposed park and ride facility giving opportunity for complementary sharing of parking areas. - Adjoins higher density housing developments and open space connection with the gully network to allow for walking and cycling to the reserve. - Relatively flat land. - Good rectangular shape without constraint of adjoining gully network / sloping land. Site could provide 4 sportsfields, cricket oval, baseball outfield, bowls pavilion, building / ablutions x 1 and car parking. Disadvantages: - Requires more landowners than option 2 to purchase land from (5 in total). - Removal of buildings needs to be taken into consideration. - Towards the northeast of the site (Prole Road end) the land slopes away with a 6m fall (approximately). The lower portion of the site may be suitable for an indoor sports centre or could be used for carparking. Extent of drop would be reduced with contouring of the upper level.
Costs (including present and future costs, direct, indirect and contingent costs).	Funded through financial contributions.
Other implications and any assumptions that relate to this option (Optional – if you want to include any information not covered above).

Option B2 (Structure Plan based on Active Reserve Option 2)
Assessment of advantages and disadvantages including impact on each of the four well-beings · Economic · Social · Cultural · Environmental	Advantages: - Suitable access can be provided from future Prole / Francis link road. This road is to be funded through financial contributions. - Is in close proximity to medium/high density residential housing however it is separated by the gully network. - Walking and cycling connections through gully (same as option 1). - Site could provide 4 sportsfields, cricket oval, baseball outfield, bowls pavilion, building / ablutions x 1 and car parking (same as option 1). Site may need additional ablutions / change facilities being split by a road. - Requires less landowners than option 1 to purchase land from (2 in total). - Removal of kiwifruit orchard during development phase likely to be less cost than development phase for option 1, which has a number of buildings to remove. Disadvantages: - Access is indirect; users will put more pressure on local roads. - Not in close proximity to the school site or town centre - Does not provide prominent entrance way into Ōmokoroa. - Site is flat to the north of the Prole / Francis connection road however is sloping down towards Francis Road over a large area. Will require significant re-contouring and shaping. - Site is constrained by adjoining gully network, the shape of the land available is restricted due to the gully and this impacts on sportsfields layout. - Link road splits the reserve. Affects flexibility of use, and potential safety hazard for reserve users. - Duplication of car park and facilities on both sides of the road. - Land is all in high producing kiwifruit orchards which will impact on purchase price.
Costs (including present and future costs, direct, indirect and contingent costs).	Funded through financial contributions.
Other implications and any assumptions that relate to this option (Optional – if you want to include any information not covered above).

Statutory Compliance

19. The Recommendations are in accordance with the Resource Management Act.

Funding/Budget Implications

Budget Funding Information	Relevant Detail
Budgeted	The Plan Change process is funded from the Resource Management Budget.

Attachments

1. Map - Active Reserves for Sports Fields Option 1 and 2 - Ariel View ⇩

Policy Committee Meeting Agenda

6 July 2021

9.2 Draft CCTV Management Plan

File Number: A4094777

Author: Tom Rutherford, Policy Analyst

Authoriser: Rachael Davie, Group Manager Policy Planning And Regulatory Services

Executive Summary

1. The Committee is asked to consider the adoption of the CCTV Management Plan.

Recommendation

1. That the Policy Analyst’s report dated 6 July 2021 titled ‘CCTV Management Plan’ be received.

2. That the report relates to an issue that is considered to be of medium significance in terms of Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. That the Policy Committee adopts the CCTV Management Plan set out in Attachment One, to be effective from 7 July 2021.

Background

Currently, the Western Bay of Plenty District has 48 CCTV cameras installed in public spaces (excluding TECT Park), including in Te Puke, Maketu, Ōmokoroa, Katikati, and Pukehina, most of which are monitored 24-7 by our District CCTV Provider, and several more which are recorded but not monitored. Almost all of these are located within urban areas. Footage from these cameras is linked to a centralised monitoring system in Te Puke.

Council’s surveillance system does not prevent criminal activity. However, the network is expected to act as a deterrent to criminal activity, and to aid policing matters by collecting visual evidence of criminal activities.

For clarity, information collected by the surveillance system can include the following:

· Video and still footage

· Number plates (from Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras)

· Time and date

· A catalogue of notable events in recorded footage (summary of event, location, date and time)

· Traffic statistics

The development of a CCTV Policy is on the Policy Committee’s work programme. The Committee previously endorsed the use of the Privacy Commissioner’s guidelines for CCTV policy development. This sets out a three stage process for policy development:

1. Evaluate whether CCTV is needed

2. Develop a business/management plan, which sets out the CCTV strategy (outcomes, system to be used etc.)

3. Develop a CCTV policy which outlines how the system will be operated and the rules which staff will abide by when using the system

The Committee endorsed that the purpose of CCTV cameras is to provide a safer environment for the community and to protect Council’s assets and infrastructure by:

· Monitoring identified trouble spots, as a deterrent to criminal activity and antisocial behaviour;

· Monitoring council assets.

In February 2021, the Committee adopted the draft CCTV Management Plan and that the the Plan be considered as ‘More Information’ and referenced in the Long Term Plan 2021-2031 Consultation Document, to support Council’s key proposal to include a budget of $50,000 per annum for the next three years for new CCTV cameras requested by the community.

In May 2021, the Long Term Plan Committee resolved that budget of $50,000 per annum be provided for the next three years for new CCTV cameras requested by the community. The Committee also resolved to approve a budget for operational costs to monitor the new CCTV cameras that will be approved and installed utilising the new $50,000 budget. The costs for operations will be $10,000 in year 1, $20,000 in year 2 and $30,000 in year 3, to support the monitoring of new cameras purchased.

The proposed final CCTV Management Plan (Attachment One to this report) has been updated to reflect the matters arising from Long Term Plan deliberations.

Significance and Engagement

1. The Local Government Act 2002 requires a formal assessment of the significance of matters and decision in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. In making this formal assessment there is no intention to assess the importance of this item to individuals, groups, or agencies within the community and it is acknowledged that all reports have a high degree of importance to those affected by Council decisions.

The Policy requires Council and its communities to identify the degree of significance attached to particular issues, proposals, assets, decisions, and activities.

2. In terms of the Significance and Engagement Policy this decision is considered to be of medium significance because of the level of financial implications, level of community interest in CCTV provision, community engagement undertaken to date and the District already having a CCTV and surveillance network which is currently operational.

Engagement, Consultation and Communication

1. In 2020 and 2021, Council has engaged with the community on CCTV through its Long Term Plan 2021–2031 process. The Long Term Plan 2021-2031 Consultation Document sought feedback on two options:

(a) Council does not increase the CCTV Security Cameras budget.

(b) Council approves a budget of $50,000 per annum for the next three years for new CCTV

2. Council received 428 pieces of feedback on the CCTV – security cameras key proposal.

· 111 (26%) supported the option that Council maintain the status quo, with no additional investment in CCTV security cameras.

· 307 (72%) supported the option that Council increase funding for new CCTV cameras (total funding of $50,000 per annum, for the next three years).

· 2% of submissions received stated that Council should increase funding for CCTV – security cameras beyond the proposed $50,000 per annum for the next three years.

3. Overall, 74% supported an increase in funding for CCTV – security cameras.

Interested/Affected Parties	Completed engagement, planned consultation
General Public	Formal consultation through the LTP 2021-2031 Phase 3 engagement (special consultative procedure).	Planned	Completed
General Public and Stakeholder Engagement	Formal consultation through the LTP 2021-2031 Phase 3 engagement (special consultative procedure).

Issues and Options Assessment

1. Council has already resolved its preferred funding option and has included that in the final Long Term Plan 2021-2031.

2. If Council chooses not to adopt the final CCTV Management Plan, the approved funding for CCTV – security cameras through the 2021-2031 Long Term Plan will still proceed. However, there may be areas of inconsistency between the funding approach set through the Long Term Plan deliberations and the content of the CCTV Management Plan.

Option A Adopt final CCTV Management Plan
Assessment of advantages and disadvantages including impact on each of the four well-beings · Economic · Social · Cultural · Environmental	The final Long Term Plan includes a budget of $50,000 per annum for the next three years for new CCTV cameras, and an approved budget for operational costs to monitor the new CCTV cameras. This funding will be used if there are any requests from the community or through community boards for new cameras, where those requests meet the criteria outlined in the management plan. Provision has been made for operational funding for existing cameras previously initiated by Community Boards. Assessment of these advantages and disadvantages was included in the Long Term Plan deliberations where the final decision was made.
Costs (including present and future costs, direct, indirect and contingent costs).	There are no additional direct costs associated with adopting the final CCTV Management Plan. The decision Council made through the Long Term Plan deliberations will have costs. These include: · Capital costs – for the purchase of new and replacement cameras. · Ongoing operational costs - for monitoring, electricity, and telecommunications.
Other implications and any assumptions that relate to this option.	The CCTV Management Plan supports the development of an operational CCTV policy. This will outline how the system will be operated and the rules, which staff will abide by when using the system.
Option B Do not adopt the final CCTV Management Plan
Assessment of advantages and disadvantages including impact on each of the four well-beings · Economic · Social · Cultural · Environmental	The draft CCTV Management Plan informed the key proposal for CCTV security cameras included in the Long Term Plan 2021-2031.The updated final plan reflects subsequent decisions made through the Long Term Plan deliberations. If the final plan is not adopted, there may be inconsistencies between the funding approach and the management plan.
Costs (including present and future costs, direct, indirect and contingent costs).	There are no direct additional costs of not adopting the CCTV Management Plan.
Other implications and any assumptions that relate to this option.	The implications are that the final CCTV Management Plan is not consistent with the funding approach set in the Long Term Plan 2021-2031.

Statutory Compliance

1. The two principle Acts applicable to CCTV and the CCTV Management Plan are the Privacy Act 2020 and the Search and Surveillance Act 2012. The Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 also applies in relation to requesting information. The CCTV Management Plan has been developed to give effect to these legislative requirements.

Funding/Budget Implications

Budget Funding Information	Relevant Detail
2021 – 2031 LTP	Funding for the capital and operational approach set out in the CCTV Management Plan has been included in the Long Term Plan.

Attachments

1. CCTV Management Plan ⇩